The Parish of
Berkswich
Berkswich Parish Hall
On 4th October 1958 a Conveyance and Trust Deed established
charitable trusts in relation
to a piece of land on which the Parish Hall was, or was to be, built.
Under the terms of those trusts, Lichfield Diocesan Trust was effectively
appointed custodian
trustee of this charity and had the freehold property vested in it, with the day
to day management
placed in the hands of a body of nine administrative trustees.
Some decades ago, for reasons which are not now clear, but probably seemed
reasonable at the
time, the function of the administrative trustees appears to have been taken
over by the
Parochial Church Council for Berkswich Parish and ultimately this seems to have
resulted
in the Parish Hall being run as if it belonged to the PCC. In fact, the real
position was
that the Parish Hall charity was entirely independent and separate charity
accounts should
have been kept (although arrangements have been put in hand since January 2005
to
ensure that separate records are available). Although it is understood that the
PCC paid
some £24,000 towards a previous refurbishment of the Hall, the Hall makes a
small profit
each year (currently in the region of £5-6,000) and since the PCC has,
apparently, run the Hall
directly since about 1986, there has probably been a net benefit to the PCC.
Whilst to a large extent this is "water under the bridge", and the money has
probably been spent
on matters consistent with the charity’s objects anyway (see below), what is
indisputable is that
the Hall is in need of urgent maintenance and repair and that external funders
are
less likely to support a strictly Church based building.
The position came to light because it was hoped to apply for grant funding to
help with
the proposed refurbishment of the Hall. The intention was (because funding
sources for
church halls are limited) that a new, wider based "community" charity would be
set up
and a lease of the Hall granted to that "new" charity, which would then apply
for funding.
It was in the course of work carried out in preparation for this, that doubts
were raised as to
whether there were validly appointed administrative trustees and that in any
event they would require the consent of the Diocesan Trust to grant any lease
for a
period longer than 3 years (when 25 to 35 years is anticipated).
Following correspondence with the Charity Commission, we were advised that the
charity should have been registered following the coming into force of the
Charities
Act 1960, but never had been. There were also other difficulties with the
original Trust
Instrument, such as a reference to "The Parish of Berkswich with Walton", which
it was
at first thought had never existed as such (later found to have been a name used
at
least by 1906). Had that been the case, then that might have cast doubt on the
ability
of any new administrative trustees to have been appointed. As it was, of the
original
administrative body of nine trustees, the 1958 document only provided for the
Vicar and
churchwardens to replace them – i.e three instead of nine ! The present
incumbents have,
up to now, been advised not to activate their trusteeships by not completing a
form of Declaration of Acceptance and Willingness to Act in the trusts of the
charity.
However, they are now prepared to do so (as they would be required to make the
application for the Albermarle Scheme mentioned below) if the way forward can be
agreed.
The current position of the Parish Hall is that use by the
Church is now relatively rare.
However, the existing trusts require that the premises are used for the benefit
of members
of the Church of England in the Parish. Therefore, the situation needs to be
regularised.
The solicitors acting for the Lichfield Diocesan Trust have been involved
throughout and
have also been in contact with the Charity Commission. Although we have not seen
any
relevant correspondence, we are told that the solicitors have persuaded the
Commission
that registration of the charity is not necessary (strictly true but still a
moot point – although
it need not detain us for the purposes of this note). The Commission is prepared
to make
what is known as an "Albermarle Scheme", which will appoint new administrative
trustees
of the charity and authorise the lease of the Hall to a new "community" charity,
as yet to be
established, on terms to be agreed. It is anticipated that any lease would
reserve
rights to allow Church use of the Hall on a specified number of occasions each
year,
free of charge (except perhaps for heating and lighting costs). The Diocesan
Trust’s solicitors
have proposed that the PCC becomes the new Administrative Trustee of the
existing charity,
replacing the Vicar and Churchwardens. It is also suggested that the PCC would
be able
to appoint at least one trustee to the new community charity.
The end result would therefore be the regularisation of the current position, in
that the PCC
would formally be appointed as the Administrative Trustee of the current
charity. In the
meantime, steps would be taken to set up a new community based charity (i.e not
restricted
to Church of England benefit), which would then take a lease of the Hall from
the existing
charity. The PCC would therefore be left in the relatively simple position of
collecting the
rent under the lease, whilst the new charity would actually run the Hall, be
responsible for
its maintenance and apply for any grant funding that was available to refurbish
or upgrade
the Hall. The rent received by the PCC (which would probably be relatively
modest – something
up to £200 p.a has been suggested by the solicitors acting for the Diocesan
Trust, although it
might be necessary to take advice on that and the other terms of any lease)
could (under the
terms of the existing trusts – which would probably not be affected by the
Albermarle Scheme)
be applied towards Church expenses in the parish; the upkeep and maintenance of
the Church,
its furnishings or the Churchyard; or any other charitable purpose having in
view the needs of
the members of the C of E in the parish.
If the PCC is content with these arrangements, the procedure would be for it to
resolve to
accept the administrative trusteeship of the existing charity under the proposed
Albermarle
Scheme and to ask the Vicar and Churchwardens to confirm their existing
trusteeships for
the sole or principal purpose of applying to the Charity Commission for that
Scheme. In the
meantime, steps will be taken to set up a new community charity. Part of that
involves
undertaking a "community consultation", asking local residents what they would
want to
see happen at the Hall, what facilities it should have and what they would be
prepared to
use it for etc. The hope is that a consultation questionnaire (a draft of which
has been prepared)
could be sent out with the Parish’s Christmas Newsletter, if the PCC is
agreeable.
I am more than happy to deal with any questions or clarifications arising from
the
above or, indeed, any other questions which any member might have. KCK 3/12/05